Don’t let all the hype fool you – Skyfall is not an easy sell. For all the
critical acclaim of Casino Royale and
the hefty box office earnings of Quantum
of Solace, the Bond fan base has been somewhat divided ever since Daniel
Craig inherited 007’s tuxedo. One half embraces the new take on her majesty’s
finest agent, an approach that is defined by brutal, furiously-edited fist
fights and grounded in reality to the point that Quantum’s villain was an eco-terrorist bent on monopolising water
supplies and selling them to puppet governments in Latin America (yawn). The
other half instead bemoans the departure of the quirky gadgets along with the
improbably-named femme fatales and longs for a villain that wields satellite
lasers, has a propensity for delivering evil monologues and is content with
residing in an active volcano. If only there was a way to please both parties…
Enter Oscar-winning director Sam Mendes, who
has pulled off the nigh-impossible task of striking the perfect balance between
realism and escapism in time for Bond’s 50th anniversary. From the
moment you see 007 nonchalantly adjust his cufflinks during a scuffle aboard a
moving train, you just know we are back in classic James Bond territory, where
a deadpan quip or the seduction of an exotic belle is never far away. But
Mendes is respectful enough not to discard completely the work that’s been done
before him, as he makes the pragmatism of the previous two films work to his
advantage – a major plotline in Skyfall
deals with how some of the more serious errors of MI6 are perceived by the
media and a tribunal of enquiry.
Another decision that is sure to have some
purists up in the arms is that of stripping Bond of his super spy persona and have
him reduced to an unkempt, boozing wanderer who can’t shoot straight to save
his life. It’s in these segments that Craig and Mendes infuse the decades’ old
spy with an amount of doubt and self-loathing never seen before and that quite
possibly we’ll never see again in the franchise. Put simply, if Casino Royale was about how James Bond
got his mojo, Skyfall is about him
losing it… before getting it back in grand, triumphant style, of course.
Just when all the dark introspection risks
outstaying its welcome, Mendes puts the film firmly back on track and we
finally get to see Craig as James Bond, rather than as a versatile actor. We
all know by now that Danny boy convinces as a cold-hearted hit-man, but we’ve
yet to see him revel in wry putdowns and the shameless womanising, which he gets
to do both in spades here. It also helps that he is up against a brilliant
villain in the form of Silva, a toad-faced Javier Bardem with bleached hair who
amuses and unsettles in equal measure. And for a franchise that is commonly
known for its use of glamorous locations around the globe, there is something immensely
refreshing about staging the film’s most gripping action sequence in the London
Underground.
So are there any let-downs? Well, the third act’s
parochial setting definitely sets the right mood for a chilly climax, although
it does play out like an odd blend of Straw
Dogs and Home Alone. Meanwhile, Albert Finney’s cuddly gamekeeper
is the kind of impromptu sidekick you’d expect from the Roger Moore era Bond
(although he does get to deliver literally a killer line).
Yet these inconsistencies matter little as the
explosive and surprisingly gut-wrenching climax is over, and the closing scene divides
audiences once again. One half will see it as a melancholic ending, the other
will no doubt see it as an exciting new beginning. But there is one thing everyone
is sure to agree on: nobody does it better than 007.
5/5
My only criticism of this fabulous film - when the Tube train crashes, its at rush hour and, save for the hi-viz wearing driver THE TRAIN IS ENTIRELY EMPTY
ReplyDelete