World War Z, the 2006 post-apocalyptic novel by
Max (son of Mel) Brooks, is one of the finest zombie texts ever written. A
collection of interviews and first person accounts, the various chapters record
the unfolding of a global zombie outbreak and humanity’s decades’ long struggle
for survival. But rather than going for predictable scares and gory
sensationalism, the personal accounts are focused more on the effects the
outbreak has on geo-politics, military tactics, the world economy and organized
religion. In the right hands, a book like this could be adapted into a terrific
SF mock-documentary that is heavy on the social commentary in the same vein as District 9, but without skimping on the
horror and chill factor so effectively conveyed in George A. Romero’s Dead series.
Trust Paramount Pictures to go mess up such a
golden opportunity. Clearly the thought of making an intelligent zombie film is
too much of a financial risk these days, so instead what we get is a bland
disaster flick not far removed from Roland Emmerich’s back catalogue and directed
by Marc Foster (who delivered the frantically edited Quantum of Solace, just to give you an idea of what you’re in for).
The plot, for startes, has been stripped of all
substance and given a Spielbergian retooling that focuses on the decidedly
cheesier themes of fatherhood and family values, which shouldn’t come as a
surprise really, when Hollywood’s busiest dad has been cast in the leading
role. The filmmakers involved believe that by making Brad Pitt’s UN operative
Gerry Lane a devoted family man, the audience will identify with his pain for
being separated from his loved ones. Instead, Gerry’s homesickness makes him a
flimsy and occasionally inept hero, as exemplified by the scene where his black
ops team is taken out by a bunch of zombies because he receives a phone call
from his wife mid-operation.
Speaking of the living dead, if you were
expecting the moaning, shuffling kind championed by Romero and actually
featured in Max Brooks’ novel, you’re in for another crushing disappointment. The
“Zekes” in WWZ the movie are more
like twitchy, screeching, coked-up Usain Bolts that sprint across cities and
for some reason spend very little time feasting on human flesh (which is the whole
point of being a zombie after all, isn’t it?). Admittedly, the idea of the undead
moving together like a compact horde of ants makes a stunning visual, but it’s
yet another development that distances the movie further from the source
material.
The only aspect of the novel that is somewhat faithfully
reproduced on-screen is the globe-trotting. With the narrative moving from the
US and South Korea to Israel and, err, South Wales, there is something wholly
disheartening seeing the world’s capitals being systematically infested. The
Jerusalem-set sequence in particular proves to be the best of the entire film, as
the undead infiltrate the city by piling one upon another to climb the titanic wall
surrounding the Middle-Eastern metropolis. It’s one of the rare moments where
the events only hinted at in Brooks’ work are effectively portrayed on the big
screen. Other memorable sections of the book however, such as the battle of
Yonkers or the clearing of the catacombs of Paris, which would’ve also made for
excellent set-pieces, are conspicuously absent.
While these are undoubtedly the rants of a
disgruntled fan of the novel, there is no denying that Marc Foster's film is average at best. The action is
derivative, the characters lackluster (you’d be forgiven for not noticing Lost’s Matthew Fox as a Navy SEAL) and the
plot weakened by the many rewrites the script reportedly went through. And
whoever thought that setting a game of hide and seek in a dreary medical centre
outside of Cardiff would make a gripping final act should go back to film
school.
For those of you who haven’t read the book and
have low standards when it comes to popcorn entertainment, you might just sit
through this fine. For those who instead were dying to see World War Z on the big-screen, you’ll more likely feel like you’re
dying inside by the time you exit the cinema.
2/5
No comments:
Post a Comment