You could say it all boils down to release dates. The Amazing Spider-man, the much
maligned yet surprisingly enjoyable reboot that featured a wall-crawler truer
to the comics, was released in June 2012, just five years after Tobey Maguire
hung up his webs and called it a day. With The
Amazing Spider-man 2 opening not even a full two years after the last
instalment, you’d be forgiven for questioning whether Sony and Columbia
Pictures are being a bit precipitous with the Spiderman franchise.
You wouldn’t be wrong, for what we have here is
a shiny-looking blockbuster with an astonishingly clunky plot that feels
disjointed and unfocused, the key signs of a film that was rushed into
production, the script a mere afterthought. The fact that Shailene Woodley’s
scenes as pending love interest Mary Jane Watson were shot and subsequently cut
from the film only adds further validity to this theory. With the pace never truly
picking up, TAS2 can often prove to
be quite a laborious viewing experience.

Speaking of which, there are also a few glaring
missteps in the portrayal of the villains, especially Jamie Foxx’s Electro, who
the posters and trailers reliably inform us is the main big bad. His human
alter-ego, Max Dillon – a sad, forgotten loner longing for attention – is an
interesting proposition, someone that should creep us out and elicit our
sympathy in equal measure, but for some reason Foxx plays the role for laughs.
Post-transformation, he’s a blue-skinned, gravelly-voiced nutter with the power
to shoot electrical discharges. Pure eye candy, granted, and he’s also at the
centre of the film’s more memorable action sequences, but it also means that Electro
feels more like an end level boss, rather than a fully rounded character. And
as for Paul Giamatti’s Russian mobster Rhino… what a waste of a good actor and
comic book character.
Dane DeHaan’s Harry Osborn on the other hand,
is a far more intriguing villain. Financially privileged but despised by his
dying father and colleagues, he could’ve easily ended up as a spoilt rich
kid caricature, but thanks to DeHaan’s jittery performance, he comes off instead
as a plausibly disturbed young man dealing with a plethora of insecurities. And
while his issues fittingly culminate in a horrific transformation into the
Green Goblin, his sudden urge to don a battle suit, not to mention his
dexterity at surfing a flying glider, is rather baffling.

At the centre of all this well-intentioned
confusion is Garfield (the actor, not the cat), who once again proves that,
while Sam Raimi may have directed better Spider-man films, Webb undeniably has
the better Spider-man. Witty, charming and unapologetically verbose, he manages
to embody the true essence of the character from the comics. More crucially, he
has not yet done a Saturday Night Fever strut down the street à la Spider-man 3. Here’s hoping that, with
bit more time at disposal and a better script at hand, The Amazing Spider-man 3 won’t go down that route too.
2/5